Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Noble Eightfold Path

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The Noble Eightfold Path

    By suggestion and out of common sense I thought it a good time to start a thread on the Noble Eightfold Path. We often speak of the Four Nobler Truths, the Five Precepts, Meditation and so forth, but really haven't delved much into the Noble Eightfold Path. In my reasoning at least, this is a majority part of the practice, as it is integral to the fundamental Four Noble Truths, being the road map tot he path out of samsara. Many many dhamma related questions can often be answered by one's ownself in daily decision making by having even a basic understanding of this Noble Eightfold Path.

    My hope is that this post can be migrated into a new forum dealing with the Noble Eightfold Path as its focus. I will be presenting the factors of the path one by one, much as the Five Precepts have been presented as individual topics elsewhere on this site. I will be using Ven. Bikkhu Bodhi's book "The Noble Eightfold Path" as reference, however, anyone is welcome to add to rebut or refute the posts using teachings from other teachers (i.e. Ajahn Brahmali, another world renown Buddhist and Pali Scholar).

    The first post regarding the first factor of the path shall follow shortly in another thread. May all beings be well and happy.

    Jerrod Lopes

  • #2
    That`s great, thanks Jerrod!

    With metta.

    Comment


    • #3
      The Noble Eightfold Path: A prologue

      Parts of this post are paraphrased form the book The Noble Eightfold Path: Way to the End of Suffering by Bhikkhu Bodhi, published by BPE/BPS Pariyatti Editions 1984, 1994.


      The Noble Eightfold Path, according to Bhikkhu Bodhi, is comrpised of components rather than as sequential steps. All eight parts can be present with time and practice, but until then, may require a sequential approach.

      The Noble Eightfold Path can be broken down for purposes of training into three groups; the moral discipline group (silakkhanda), made up of right speech, right action and right livelihood; the concentration group (samadhikkhanda), made up of right effort, right mindfulness and right concentration; and the wisdom group (pannakkhanda) made up of right view and right intention. These can be said, then, to approach training through three stages; higher moral discipline, higher consciousness and higher wisdom.

      Since the aim of the practice really is to achieve liberation by uprooting ignorance, wisdom must be cultivated. Wisdom cannot be attained by will, kind acts or meditation alone. A clear view of the dhamma, its aims and its application must be had. Right view, while not a stand alone doctrine, is a logical starting point for our purposes and for any practice. Right view will be our first component of the Noble Eightfold Path here.

      Comment


      • #4
        You're welcome Rudite.

        Comment


        • #5
          This is taken from access to insight http://www.accesstoinsight.org/ptf/d.../samma-ditthi/

          Right View is the first of the eight path factors in the Noble Eightfold Path, and belongs to the wisdom division of the path.

          The definition
          "And what is right view? Knowledge with regard to stress, knowledge with regard to the origination of stress, knowledge with regard to the cessation of stress, knowledge with regard to the way of practice leading to the cessation of stress: This is called right view."

          There is the definition. So begins the discussion.

          Jerrod

          Comment


          • #6
            Jerrod thank you for taking time and effort in doing the initial work.

            My interpretation goes this way:

            Initially these 4 kinds of knowledge start with being aware of that stress(dukka) exists : through the Buddhist teaching(scriptures, communities) combined with contemplation of one's life in and out.

            Then the Buddhist teachings plant the knowledge for knowing the roots of stress, the knowledge that it is possible to get out of it, and the knowledge about how it is being done.

            Initially they were knowledge, taken on merit, rather guiding assumptions I would say.

            Now these, in a spiral movement of continuous effort, lead to wisdom.(different from knowledge)

            Repeat : Initially they were knowledge, taken on merit, rather guiding assumptions.

            This spiral movement is nothing but the Noble Eightfold Path- other 7 plus right view itself.

            with metta
            sunil

            Comment


            • #7
              however what is the place for the rebirth concept and karma-vipaka concept in the Right view?

              with metta
              sunil

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Jerrod Lopes View Post

                The definition
                "And what is right view? Knowledge with regard to stress, knowledge with regard to the origination of stress, knowledge with regard to the cessation of stress, knowledge with regard to the way of practice leading to the cessation of stress: This is called right view."

                Jerrod
                Of course there are other definitions in the suttas eg.

                "There is what is given, what is offered, what is sacrificed. There are fruits & results of good & bad actions. There is this world & the next world. There is mother & father. There are spontaneously reborn beings; there are priests & contemplatives who, faring rightly & practicing rightly, proclaim this world & the next after having directly known & realized it for themselves."

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Sunil Dandeniya View Post
                  however what is the place for the rebirth concept and karma-vipaka concept in the Right view?

                  with metta
                  sunil
                  Sunil,

                  I apologize as I do not have right view in hand well enough myself to understand your question! LOL Would you be kind enough as to rephrase your question?

                  Jerrod

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Here is another definition of Right View, also known as Right Understanding, taken from here;
                    http://www.thebigview.com/buddhism/eightfoldpath.html

                    1. Right View

                    Right view is the beginning and the end of the path, it simply means to see and to understand things as they really are and to realise the Four Noble Truth. As such, right view is the cognitive aspect of wisdom. It means to see things through, to grasp the impermanent and imperfect nature of worldly objects and ideas, and to understand the law of karma and karmic conditioning. Right view is not necessarily an intellectual capacity, just as wisdom is not just a matter of intelligence. Instead, right view is attained, sustained, and enhanced through all capacities of mind. It begins with the intuitive insight that all beings are subject to suffering and it ends with complete understanding of the true nature of all things. Since our view of the world forms our thoughts and our actions, right view yields right thoughts and right actions.

                    I think in simpler terms that right view is the facet of wisdom allowing us to see what truly is, without preferences, perceptions and pre-conceived ideas.

                    For example. I believe there was a simile of a table or some such thing. When we see that a "table" does not exist, but that it is comprised of a mostly flat surface and a platform or legs to raise, support and suspend it above the ground...we then have a "table". Without the parts, there is no table. Even when the parts are present and integral, is there really a table? If an object is of one piece, but has the shape of a table; is it still a table? But does it really only have one part? What about the atoms, molecules, the space between these particles?

                    Jerrod

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Jerrod,
                      I heard that the concepts of rebirth and kamma also are included in samma ditti. Was a bit lazy to examine the scriptures!!

                      You seem to delve into word-magic when you try to construct and deconstruct a table. How do you know that there exist atoms, molecules and space ?

                      Here we come to the paradox of external reality and its internal representation.

                      with metta
                      sunil

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Hi Sunil,

                        Originally posted by Sunil Dandeniya View Post
                        however what is the place for the rebirth concept and karma-vipaka concept in the Right view?

                        with metta
                        sunil
                        My understanding is that the view that our actions have consequences (kamma) and that this life is not all there is (rebirth), if looked at in the right way, can motivate us to:

                        1) do skillful/wholesome actions of body/speech/mind
                        2) avoid unskillful/unwholesome actions of body/speech/mind

                        ...and, ideally...

                        3) purify the mind

                        At the very least, with Right View of rebirth and kamma, we intend to minimize suffering in this lifetime and any potential future lifetimes by making good kamma and avoiding bad kamma. At best, we resolve to purify our mind, making an end to the cycle of rebirth altogether.

                        Metta,

                        Guy

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Sunil,

                          You asked....
                          "You seem to delve into word-magic when you try to construct and deconstruct a table. How do you know that there exist atoms, molecules and space ? "

                          I have seen cellular constructs with the aid of microscopes. I have seen pictures of molecular structures. I see how the planets and stars are arranged and how all are very similar in layout and movement. The Buddha mentions space and emptiness often. We can all see that there are components to everything. Nothing exists inherently, on its own, to my knowledge. It is assumed then that there is space and form. The problem lies in identification of form and action by name, taking for granted that a thing is what we say it is just because we say it is. Is the ocean a singular thing? Some may say yes, but separate one drop of water from the ocean and is it still one thing, existing of its own accord, of one solid piece?

                          I suggest keeping it simple, because, at least in my experience it is that one of the fundamental failings of humanity is the desire to complicate things.

                          My miserable attempt to recollect the "Simile of the Table" may better be stated by the actual, and well known Simile of the Chariot. It should be noted that this sutta is not cited for reference to anatta, rather it is referred to for its content regarding dependent origination.

                          http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vajira

                          Respect and metta,

                          Jerrod
                          Last edited by Jerrod Lopes; 17th-August-2011, 12:50 PM. Reason: Addition of supporting text

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Jerrod,

                            I have also heard that this stuff, these molecules, atoms, then electrons, protons, neutrons also further down the level - quarks with so many spins - exist. In fact I have seen pictures, heard academic lectures as a student and then obediently applied this "sure knowledge" to pass some exams. Interesting stuff , yes. Also gave me a living. And the products like broadband help me.

                            I suggest keeping it simple, because, at least in my experience it is that one of the fundamental failings of humanity is the desire to complicate things.
                            You are talking of keeping it simple, but is not it already becoming complex? Who or what keeps on making it complex?

                            To John Doulton or even to Mendeleev, these quark levels and quantum uncertainty would sound pretty complex. This path is useful in day to day life, -that of reduction to components- but it is stopping there.

                            Buddha also used components like Rupa kalapa etc in his analysis of reality as teaching tools, but keeping the big picture always clear. When teaching tools assume a life of their own what happens?

                            I think that this is something bit difficult to convey , but I will also try, like you.

                            I have seen cellular constructs with the aid of microscopes. I have seen pictures of molecular structures. I see how the planets and stars are arranged and how all are very similar in layout and movement.
                            I also have seen 2 pictures of Jerrod Lopez. I have seen men and women in live, talked with them. But i wonder, who is this Lopez, etc? Is that bad?

                            with metta
                            sunil

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Guy,

                              We have similar ideas about this. I just wanted to clarify the definition given by Jerrod(accestoinsight), since it made no mention of rebirth, karma etc.

                              The definition
                              "And what is right view? Knowledge with regard to stress, knowledge with regard to the origination of stress, knowledge with regard to the cessation of stress, knowledge with regard to the way of practice leading to the cessation of stress: This is called right view."
                              with metta
                              sunil

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X

                              Debug Information